News on KBR Chemical Exposure Litigation

This site is not affiliated with nor sponsored by KBR or its affiliated companies

Home» KBR Lawsuits » KBR Must Face Guardsmen’s Toxic-Chromium Suit, Judge Says
|

KBR Must Face Guardsmen’s Toxic-Chromium Suit, Judge Says

KBR Inc. (KBR) must face a trial on claims that it knowingly exposed U.S. troops to toxic chromium dust in 2003 while they were guarding a company work site in Iraq, a Houston judge ruled.

Dozens of U.S. national guardsmen from Indiana and West Virginia have sued the Houston-based military contractor over health problems they blame on exposure to hexavalent chromium dust, a carcinogenic orange-yellow powder used to fight corrosion in water pipes. The troops were guarding KBR workers as they tried to restore water treatment facilities at the Quarmat Ali oil production site.

KBR had argued the case couldn’t be tried without asking jurors to judge actions and decisions by the U.S. military, which is forbidden by law. U.S. District Judge Vanessa Gilmore yesterday rejected that argument.

“Because KBR played a significant role in assessing and responding to the hazards, the issue of whether KBR caused plaintiffs’ injuries may be resolved without second-guessing the military’s decisions,’’ she said in a 15-page ruling. She said the case could be tried without evaluating military policies or “expressing a lack of respect for the military’s decisions.’’

Sarah Ui Mhuirgheasa, KBR’s spokeswoman, didn’t immediately respond to a call or e-mail requesting comment on the ruling.

“This is a very important step in uncovering what KBR has tried really hard to keep a lid on at Quarmat Ali,’’ Mike Doyle, lead attorney for the soldiers, said in a phone interview today. “Two soldiers have died, and all these men have health issues to some degree. They really want this evidence to come out.’’

He said jury selection could start in September.

The case is McManaway v KBR Inc., 4:10-cv-1044, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas (Houston).

To contact the reporter on this case: Laurel Brubaker Calkins in Houston atlaurel@calkins.us.com.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Andrew Dunn at adunn8@bloomberg.net

 

Short URL: http://kbrlitigation.com/?p=2591

Posted by Jeff Raizner on Aug 20 2012. Filed under KBR Lawsuits, Michael Patrick Doyle, National Media, Qarmat Ali Blog, Qarmat Ali Case Update, Texas Court Rulings. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Recently Commented

  • Reggie Faas: Rattling nice style and design and fantastic content material , nothing else we require : D.
  • Michael Hobson: As usual, corporations have worked with our supposed elected representatives/leaders (Dick Chaney,...
  • Burn Pit Voices: We are kindly asking you to be the voice for troops; we need your support to have our voice’s be...
  • David lyle: I was there from April 2003 to aug 2003. What are the symptoms now in 2012? Am I going to die? What...
  • Larry Roberta: http://media.oregonlive.com/he alth_impact/other/Qarmat%20Ali %20FINAL%20Report%20Sept%2028. pdf Here...